SIDE-BY-SIDE / METHODS FIRST
Compare outputs,
not slogans.
No universal winner — and no universal quant.
Choose the model, precision route and runtime whose complete workflow fits the asset you need to ship.
01 / PRECISION ROUTE COMPARISON↗
TRELLIS.2 INT8 ConvRot vs GGUF
Compare BF16, INT8 ConvRot, GGUF Q8, and GGUF Q4 by package scope, runtime, backend evidence, and complete-workflow risk.
BF16INT8GGUF
02 / MODEL COMPARISON↗TRELLIS.2 vs Hunyuan3D 2.1
Compare an O-Voxel-native PBR pipeline with a modular shape-and-paint system.
InputsOutputLocal setup
03 / MODEL COMPARISON↗TRELLIS.2 vs Pixal3D
Compare the TRELLIS.2 baseline with a pixel-aligned method whose current implementation builds on it.
InputsOutputLocal setup
04 / MODEL COMPARISON↗TRELLIS.2 vs Stable Fast 3D
Compare high-resolution O-Voxel generation with a compact, UV-unwrapped reconstruction workflow.
InputsOutputLocal setup